Alexander 163 Rotary CC Tuba
SKU: 85991482840

Alexander 163 Rotary CC Tuba

Sale price$6795.00 Regular price$7550.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 7 - Jul 12

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Alexander 163 Rotary CC TubaThis is a new Alexander CC tuba built in 2023, in stock here at The Horn Guys. 163 CC tuba Five rotary valves by Meinlschmidt, bronze bushings and Minibal linkages Fifth rotor tuned to flat whole step, right hand, open wrap yellow brass body with nickel trim and gold brass leadpipe gold brass bell with engraved nickel kranz fixed thumb ring Clear lacquer finish Josef Klier TA1 mouthpiece Weight: 20. 0 lbs. A recent mouthpiece test on the 163 included

This is a new Alexander CC tuba built in 2023, in stock here at The Horn Guys.

163 CC tuba

  • Five rotary valves by Meinlschmidt, bronze bushings and Minibal linkages
  • Fifth rotor tuned to flat whole step, right hand, open wrap
  • yellow brass body with nickel trim and gold brass leadpipe
  • gold brass bell with engraved nickel kranz
  • fixed thumb ring
  • Clear lacquer finish
  • Josef Klier TA1 mouthpiece
  • Weight: 20.0 lbs.

 

A recent mouthpiece test on the 163 included its Klier TA1, a Robert Tucci RT-50 and RT-88.  The TA1 gives the most centered presence and lively German sound.  The RT-50 has less presence down low.  The RT-88 would be the favorite with some practice.  Its larger size helps facilitate smoother slurs like from F# to G# and helps give voluminous tone.  The Tucci Paul der Groß might be a good choice too.

Pitch is good.  All the harmonics are really close up and down the range, arpeggios feel good, within just a few cents.  The open C lies a little higher than the open G, both octaves, it settles when you fill up the horn.  A better player than I would line up the C-G better naturally.  E below the staff feels better with third valve as is common.  In the staff, open E is fine, no need for 1+2.  This Alex will work with you, it's not stiff.  As you learn where to blow this horn, it's pretty flexible and you shouldn't expect much slide pulling.

One client asked about the open wrap fifth slide.  I don't mind its placement, reaching through the fifth loop to pull the first slide is easy.  The left hand can support the tuba near the third rotor and its fine.  Others may wish to do their first slide handling by reaching through the fourth slide.  The fifth loop is inboard from the top bow and bell so remains out of the way during travel.

The Alexander 163 has a nice balance of traits due to its large body and larger .808" (20.5mm) bore through its long rotary valve block.  It doesn't back up in the low range like a 186, and it's not too voluminous like a 6/4 size.  This instrument is very light for a large tuba.  It weighs 20.5 lbs (9.3kg).  You'll find you can sound louder and clearer with less effort on an Alexander.

Workmanship is outstanding.  All slides are fit very tightly, rotors are silent, all joints and alignment and buffing are perfect.  The lacquer is flawless, heirloom quality.  Ships a la carte, in a Cronkhite Cordura case (shown), Miraphone gig bag or Winter hard case.

Robert Tucci comments on which mouthpiece he likes for the Alexander:

On the "Alexander" CC-Tuba, it seems you have a unique instrument
compared to all the heavy metal made by others.  I would have to play
one of the modern versions.  Many years ago, early Seventies, I bought
one but could not come to terms with the intonation.  The PT-6 rotary,
christened the "York-xander" by Ivan Hammond, was much easier to play. 
I do have memories of listening to Chester Schmitz/BSO when the
orchestra was in DC (1967-68).  He sounded very good on both the CC and
the F. Other than that, Ronny Bishop got great results, even with a
rather unorthodox approach to slide manipulation etc. There are various
Szell-era Cleveland recordings where he sounds really good. One is "Hary
Janos" for example. As for a mouthpiece, our larger models might result
in too much intonation spread.  My answer for anything old and German is
the PT-82.  This is based on the traditional "apple-shaped" cup approach
all the old-times used, but with a larger cup and throat and a decent
time. The RT-72 is in some ways similar yet smaller.  That would offer
good control over the intonation.  Those who once played the 163 used
much smaller mouthpieces (Sixties-Seventies) than are common nowadays.

-Robert Tucci 1.2.21

_____

The Alexander model 163 tuba has been in limited production for many decades, both in BBb and CC.  The modern CC 163 has been redesigned since the old days.  It's larger, less quirky, and right in tune up and down.  And it's still as light in weight and response as you remember.

This hand made professional CC tuba is custom built in Mainz, Germany. Its rotary valves are .808" bore, and construction is very light yellow brass sheet with optional gold brass bell, or all gold brass body. The bell is made the old fashioned way, with a large hand-hammered piece of brass finished with triangle seams. This method of production requires a fair amount of skill and is considered a superior way to build a bell flare. It doesn't get much classier than an Alexander tuba. These are very light instruments, and they're simply alive when you play them. Similar lightweight models are made by Rudolph Meinl, Gronitz, and Adams, and all these are distinct from the heavier offerings from B&S, Miraphone, and Willson. Older Alex tubas have had a reputation for quirkiness. However these new models are most excellent - this is a modern design. The sound of this horn is a classic orchestral tuba sound: large bore, rotary valves, light bell. The Meinlschmidt rotors are fast and silent. The response is almost immediate and the tone is pure and rich with a powerful sonic quality. Check out the amazing details and hand engraving in the photos. Most players who stop by the shop find this to be one of their favorite large CC tubas.

Included

  • JK mouthpiece
  • cloth storage bag
  • lubricants
  • Cronkhite Soft Case

 

Who won an audition on an Alexander 163 tuba?

National Symphony - won by David Bragunier in 1961
Boston Symphony/Boston Pops - won by Chester Schmitz in 1966
Cleveland Orchestra- won by Ronald Bishop in 1967
Cincinnati Symphony/Cincinnati Pops - won by Mike Thornton in 1976
Houston Symphony - won by David Kirk in 1982
U.S. Army Field Band - won by David Zerkel in 1986
U.S. Army Band - won by David Zerkel in 1990
Florida Philharmonic - runner up Lee Hipp in 1991
San Antonio Symphony - won by Lee Hipp in 1991
Oklahoma City Philharmonic - won by Ted Cox in 1993
Greenwich Village Orchestra - won by Ben Vokits in 2010

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 85991482840

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 652 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
Sean Paris
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 1
If you are looking for the worst… buy this
I ordered two of these for a school classroom. Not only did they not provide enough connecting screws for the wheels - in either package - they ones they did provide were too long and could not be fully screwed in. I could see if it was one of them, but both packages had the exact same error. Please don’t buy this. You will only be frustrated.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2024
T
Verified Purchase
Teresa
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 2
Flimsy, does not stand up straight
Very flimsy and doesn’t stand up straight
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2024
R
Verified Purchase
Randy Deasy
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Not to thick or thin well made
Size: Medium, Color: (601) Bittersweet Pink / Stone / Stone
I bought pink so as not to lose when doing laundry with my daughter who steels all socks lol!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
Stacey Cohick
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Perfect
Size: X-Large, Color: (601) Bittersweet Pink / Stone / Stone
They were perfect
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 27, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
Susan Brown
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Very Comfortable!
Size: Medium, Color: (601) Bittersweet Pink / Stone / Stone
Very comfortable. Don’t slip off back of heal. Love the colors.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2026

recommand products